American Christians for Truth and Justice

Tag: bible

  • Could Donald Trump be the Antichrist (part 3)

    In part 1 of this series, we considered three reasons why Donald Trump could be the Antichrist: because he has a Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions, he speaks proud words and blasphemies, and his character is the opposite to that of Christ. In part 2, we looked at several considerations or events that would need to happen if he is to become the Antichrist: he would need to stay in office beyond his second term, he would continue to threaten and take over more countries, he would likely have a role in bringing about the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem, and he would recover from a fatal (or apparently fatal) wound.

    We are now ready to take up the final sign, which if fulfilled by Mr. Trump would unequivocally identify him as the Antichrist, and that is desecrating the temple, setting up an image of himself and demanding to be worshipped. This event is prophesied multiple times in Scripture as a pivotal event of the end-times scenario, as the event which openly reveals who the Antichrist is and simultaneously serves as the marker that begins the 42 months of Great Tribulation. Jesus spoke about it in the Olivet Discourse when he said, “So when you see standing in the holy place ‘the abomination that causes desolation,’ spoken of by Daniel the prophet … then let those in Judea flee into the mountains … for then there will be great distress [KJV great tribulation], unequaled from the beginning of the world until now” (Matt. 24:1-16, 21). The words of Daniel the prophet that he refers to are from the prophecy of the 70 weeks: “He will confirm a covenant with many for one ‘seven’ [KJV week] and in the middle of the ‘seven’ he will put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on a wing of the temple, he will set up an abomination that causes desolation …” (Dan 9:27).  Although the prophecy of the 70 weeks has many interpretations, the most common among those who believe in a future Great Tribulation with a literal future Antichrist is that “he” refers to the Antichrist, who establishes a peace treaty (confirms a covenant) with Israel and her neighbors, quite possibly allowing for the rebuilding of the temple (third sign above). When the temple is rebuilt, sacrifices will be offered on the altar, as in the Old Testament, but in the middle of the week the Antichrist will put an end to the sacrifices and set up the abomination of desolation.  What is this?  I believe the answer is in 2 Thessalonians 2:4, which says of the man of lawlessness (the Antichrist): “He will oppose and will exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshipped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God.” Setting himself up in God’s temple seems to correlate with Revelation 13:14-15, which says that the second beast (commonly called the false prophet, the right-hand man of the Antichrist) “ordered them to set up an image in honor of the beast who was wounded by the sword and yet lived. He was given power to give breath to the image of the first beast, so that it could speak and cause all who refused to worship the image to be killed” (perhaps an AI robot look-alike of the Antichrist?). This action and event will mark a bold advance to a next stage in which the Antichrist breaks his former alliances with the Jews and Christian Nationalists, reckoning that he is now powerful enough that he no longer needs them and can elevate himself to the status of god.

    This scenario fits well with a common interpretation of the Babylon theme in the book of Revelation. In chapter 14, there are three angelic pronouncements.  The first is for the worldwide spread of the gospel (14:6-7) and the second relates to Babylon: “Fallen! Fallen is Babylon the Great, which made the nations drink the maddening wine of her adulteries.” Since the worldwide spread of the gospel seems to precede the beginning of the Great Tribulation (see Matthew 24:14 in its larger context of 24:3-21, where the worldwide proclamation of the gospel is the last of the signs which precedes the Great Tribulation) and since the message of the third angel (Rev 14:9-12) relates to the Great Tribulation itself (people receiving the mark of the beast which dooms them to judgment and saints who are called to persevere through a difficult time), it seems reasonable to conclude that the fall of Babylon announced by the second angel coincides with the beginning of the Great Tribulation. However, later in Revelation the fall of Babylon is portrayed as being at the very end of the Great Tribulation.  In connection with the 7th bowl judgement, which is the last of seven judgments in the last of three series of judgements (seals, trumpets, bowls) during the Great Tribulation, it is said, “The great city split into three parts, and the cities of the nations collapsed. God remembered Babylon the Great and gave her the cup filled with the wine of the fury of his wrath” (Rev 16:19). The verse preceding this section sets the scene as Armageddon: “Then they gathered the kings together to the place that in Hebrew is called Armageddon” (16:16). This chronology correlates with the sequence we see in Revelation 19, which begins with the fall of Babylon (the great prostitute, 19:4, compare to 18:5), followed by the return of Christ to fight against the beast (Antichrist) and his armies (which is the Battle of Armageddon, 19:11-21). How do we resolve this apparent discrepancy about when the fall of Babylon occurs, for it seems like there is a fall of Babylon at the beginning of the Great Tribulation and at the end?  A common interpretation among those who hold to a future Great Tribulation with a literal Antichrist is the two-Babylon view, in which there is a spiritual Babylon and a political Babylon.  Spiritual Babylon is a false church or religious system that rides to power with the Antichrist in a mutually beneficial relationship.  The false church provides the core support for the soon-to-be-Antichrist, apart from which he would not gain the power that he does.  On the other hand, in this transactional relationship, the Antichrist gives the false church access to power it would not otherwise have.  But by the time this person reveals himself as the Antichrist at the beginning of the Great Tribulation, he will have gained enough power that he feels he no longer needs their support, so he is emboldened to take his self-promotion to the next level by setting up an image of himself in the temple—an action that will alienate two key allies: Israel and his Christian support base. This is quite possibly referred to in Revelation 17:16, which says, “The beast [Antichrist] and the ten horns you saw will hate the prostitute [Babylon, see verse 5]. They will bring her to ruin and leave her naked; they will eat her flesh and burn her with fire.”  Political Babylon, then, would be the political worldwide kingdom that Antichrist rules over during the Great Tribulation (or more specifically, perhaps, the capital city of this kingdom) which will be destroyed by Christ in connection with his second coming.

    As we have seen, there is still a lot that needs to happen before we could say definitively that Donald Trump is the Antichrist. Each of these signs will involve a major development that is almost unthinkable. This last sign in particular involves a brazen, bold act of self-promotion and blasphemy that is hard to imagine. Yet at the same time these events, including the last one, are not out of character for the type of person that Mr. Trump has shown himself to be—loyal only to himself, and unabashedly self-promoting and prone to do or say things that were previously unthinkable.

    So, what are we to do?  We should not jump to conclusions.  It is probably still more likely that Donald Trump is not the Antichrist than that he is.  But we need to be watchful and must not allow ourselves to be deceived by him or by whoever turns out to be the Antichrist. “Be always on the watch, and pray that you may be able to escape all that is about to happen, and that you may be able to stand before the Son of Man” (Luke 21:36).

  • Could Donald Trump be the Antichrist (part 2)

    In the last blog, I asked “Could Donald Trump be the Antichrist?”  I answered that he could be because he has a Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions, he speaks proud words and blasphemies, and his character is the opposite to that of Christ.  This doesn’t mean Mr. Trump necessarily is the Antichrist, but only that he could be, if additional events unfold according to the pattern set out in the prophetic scriptures. What are these additional events that we should be watching for to determine whether he is the Antichrist? 

    Before beginning to enumerate these, it should be pointed out that these items are based on a futuristic interpretation of end-time prophecies.  This approach is used mostly by premillennialists, especially dispensationalists.  Some other interpretive approaches, such as amillennial (typical of Reformed theology) do not necessarily look for a literal future Great Tribulation period or for a future literal Antichrist figure. If these events do start to take place, whether involving Donald Trump or someone else, it will show that this futuristic interpretation should be taken seriously.  If they take place soon and involve Mr. Trump, then the probability increases with each successive event that he is the Antichrist.

    The first item is not derived from biblical prophecy but is purely a matter of practical consideration, and that is that Donald Trump would need to stay in power beyond the end of his second term.  If seems highly unlikely that he could assume dominant power on the world stage if he lost his position of power as President of the United States.  His position as president gives him a platform of power from which to exert his power on the rest of the world.  Without that, it is hard to conceive of how he could become a ruler over the world, as will be true of the Antichrist (Rev. 13:7). As the Antichrist is said to rule over every people and nation for 42 months and the time remaining in President Trump’s second term is less than 42 months, it would not be possible for him to be the Antichrist unless he remains in power beyond his second term.  Another practical consideration is that he would need to live long enough for the Great Tribulation period to be completed.

    According to the U.S. Constitution, President Trump is not allowed to run for a third term, but he has mused from time to time that he would find a way to get around this.  While at present, it seems that he is prepared to concede the two-term limitation, it would not be out of character for him to change his mind. Hopefully, our democratic institutions and processes would be strong enough to prevent this from happening.  But again, it would not be out of character for him to find false pretense for canceling elections and declaring martial law to stay in power.  Or, if he does run again and doesn’t win, it is highly predictable that he would say the election was stolen and declare himself the winner anyway. And since he is Commander in Chief and has largely installed loyalists within the military, who would be able to stop him?  This scenario may seem like a longshot, and it may indeed be, but if it happens, then beware!  And be ready to watch for the next things on the list.

    The next item to watch for then, would be whether Mr. Trump continues to threaten and take over more countries.  Daniel prophesies about the fourth beast with ten horns in Daniel chapter 7, commonly understood to be the Antichrist.  This beast has a little horn which comes up among the 10 horns, and three of the (10) first horns are uprooted before it (Dan 7:8, 20). The 10 horns presumably represent an alliance of 10 nations or rulers which make up the power base of the Antichrist. We do not yet know what this 10-nation alliance will be, so if that comes into shape, that is another indicator that things are moving along.  Three of those nations will be overthrown by the Antichrist as he continues to consolidate his power.  President Trump has taken the role of a bully in threatening other nations, such as Greenland and Canada.  He has essentially taken over Venezuela and is threatening to take over Cuba through economic pressure.  If this pattern continues, and he overthrows three nations that were part of an alliance with him previously, then this would be another sign that Mr. Trump was on track to be the Antichrist. 

    A third item to watch for would be the rebuilding of the temple in Jerusalem. Several prophecies indicate that during the Great Tribulation there will exist such a temple, which until now has not existed since the destruction of the previous temple in 70 A.D. In Revelation 11, John says, “I was given a reed like a measuring rod and was told, ‘Go and measure the temple of God and the altar … But exclude the outer court … because it has been given to the Gentiles. They will trample on the holy city for 42 months’” (Rev. 11:1-2).  This period of 42 months is the Great Tribulation, and it will begin with the desecration of the temple by the man of lawlessness (the Antichrist) (2 Thess 2:3-4). This will be the fifth sign that we will return to in part 3 of this series. But the point for now is that to set the stage for this to happen, the temple must be rebuilt.  There is a temple movement among Orthodox Jews with that desire.  See, for example Israel’s priests prepare third temple  Possibly permission for this to happen could come from a peace treaty that President Trump puts in place or as a provision of the Board of Peace, of which he has appointed himself the chair.  This, of course, would be a major development, but in our world today previously unthinkable things seem to be happening regularly. If this one happens, and Donald Trump is at the center of it, although it could be an event celebrated by pro-Israel Christians, it would, in my mind, tip the scales from possible to probable in terms of Mr. Trump being the Antichrist.

    The fourth sign to watch for which would “seal the deal” in my mind is if Mr. Trump recovers from a fatal (or apparently fatal) wound. Prophesying about the beast (Antichrist), John says, “One of the heads of the beast seemed to have had a fatal wound, but the fatal wound was healed” (Rev. 13:3). This is referenced again later in the chapter when it refers to the first beast as the one “whose fatal wound had been healed” (13:12). As a result of this remarkable recovery, we are told that “the whole world was astonished and followed the beast … and they also worshipped the beast” (13:3-4). President Trump has already survived several assassination attempts, one in particular which was a “close call.” Around this has grown up a narrative that he is somehow invincible and that God has protected him because he is anointed for a special role.  If he could be resurrected from a fatal wound, this would take that narrative to a whole new level and would elicit awe, not just from his core followers, but from the whole world. But note that Revelation 13:3 says, “seemed to have had a fatal wound.” No mere human has the power to raise himself from the dead, and although the Antichrist will be empowered by Satan, it is doubtful that Satan has the power to raise from the dead, as God alone is the source of life.  More likely is that the Antichrist suffers and recovers from a near fatal wound but then spins a narrative (with the collusion of loyalist doctors and staff) that he died and rose again, thus appearing to duplicate what Christ did in rising from the dead.  If something like this happens to Mr. Trump, it is not inconsistent with his character or his supersized ego to think that he would claim such a thing.

    This would set the stage for the final sign, which if fulfilled by Mr. Trump would unequivocally identify him as the Antichrist, which will be taken up in part 3 of this series.

    As you can see, there are still several significant items that would need to line up to conclude that Donald Trump is the Antichrist.  At this point, it is still more probable that he is not the Antichrist than that he is.  However, given his Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions, his proud words and blasphemies, and his character qualities that are the opposite to that of Christ, and the repeated admonitions in Scripture to watch, lest we be taken by surprise (such as Matt. 24:42 and Luke 21:34-36) it would be unwise not to take the possibility seriously and to be watching to see whether Mr. Trump’s “Antichrist portfolio” continues to accumulate supporting evidence or not.

  • Could Donald Trump be the Antichrist?

    Recently several comments have been made suggesting that Donald Trump might be the Antichrist.  Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump supporter now turned critic, called his post, in which he seemingly portrayed himself as Jesus, blasphemy and said this was “an Antichrist spirit.”  Tucker Carlson, another supporter turned critic, responded to this same post, in which Mr. Trump was dressed in Christ-like robes, healing the sick with a glowing light emitting from his hands, calling it a mockery of Jesus and asking, “Could this be the Antichrist?” To be clear, neither Ms. Greene nor Mr. Carlson stated emphatically that President Trump is the Antichrist—they merely raised the question of whether he might be.  So, let’s consider the question, “Could Donald Trump be the Antichrist?”

                But first, let us clarify what we are talking about.  Who or what is this Antichrist? In a general sense, the Apostle John refers to what we might call the “antichrist spirit” when he says, “Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son” (1 John 2:22). But Christians who believe in a futuristic interpretation of the book of Revelation also believe that there will be a singular person, the Antichrist, in connection with a future Great Tribulation period just prior to the second coming of Christ (Matt 24:29-31). During this Great Tribulation, a world leader, referred to figuratively in Scripture by such terms as the beast (Rev. 13:1-10), the man of lawlessness (2 Thess 2:1-12), or the little horn (Daniel 7:8, 10-25), but popularly referred to as the Antichrist, will rule the world and persecute God’s people for 42 months before being defeated by Jesus at his second coming (Rev 19:11-21). This is the one I am referring to when I ask if Donald Trump could be the Antichrist.

                Before considering this question, a word of caution is in order. Many have been thought to be the Antichrist throughout the Christian era, including Nero and Adolf Hitler.  Martin Luther also famously called the pope the Antichrist. But none of these or the many others who have been identified actually were the Antichrist. So, we must be cautious in claiming that someone is the Antichrist.  Thus, that is not what I will be doing in this blog.  What I am asking is whether Donald Trump could be the Antichrist—that is, is he a suitable candidate and does this possibility warrant close watching?  With that clarification in mind, let us consider three reasons why Donald Trump could be the Antichrist.

                First, Mr. Trump has a Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions. This was evident from the recent post he made of himself as Christ or a Christ-like figure, as mentioned above. But even prior to that, there have been references from President Trump himself or from his supporters that encouraged us to see him as a Messianic figure of sorts. The word “messiah” literally means “anointed one,” and references to President Trump as one anointed by God have been common among his followers.  They don’t necessarily mean by this that he is the “Anointed One” in a capital “A” sense, but certainly the sentiment is strong among Trump’s followers and seems to have been internalized by Mr. Trump himself that he is a special anointed one, chosen by God for a special purpose. President Trump’s comments after he survived a near assassination reflect this. Mr. Trump’s recent post merely makes that Messianic identity bolder and more explicit.   His portrayal of himself as the pope in a May 2025 AI-generated post also communicated a similar message. Regarding Messianic ambitions, it has become evident, although Mr. Trump once campaigned almost as an isolationist, desiring to keep America out of wars in the global arena, that his oversized ego desires dominance on the world stage.  His not-so-subtle bid to be awarded the Nobel Peace prize and his bold move in establishing the Board of Peace with himself as the chairman also indicate (his aggressive role in starting the war in Iran notwithstanding) that he desires to be honored on the world stage as the one who brings world peace. In the prophetic blueprint of the Antichrist, it is commonly understood that the Antichrist will bring temporary world peace.  Thus, people will be saying, prior to the return of Jesus, “Peace and safety” (1 Thess 5:3). Jesus, the true Christ, will establish world peace when he comes again to set up God’s kingdom (Isaiah 2:4, 9:7). The Antichrist wants to pre-empt Christ by becoming a world ruler who brings peace before Jesus can do it. Donald Trump’s Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions to establish world peace indeed suggest that he could be the Antichrist. 

                Second, in keeping with the prophetic profile of the Antichrist, Mr. Trump utters proud words and even words which some have been calling blasphemous. Revelation 13:5, describing the future beast that comes out of the sea (the Antichrist), says: “The beast was given a mouth to utter proud words and blasphemies.” Daniel 7, speaking of the Antichrist as the little horn, provides an earlier statement of the same theme when it says of him, “This horn had eyes like the eyes of a man and a mouth that spoke boastfully” (Dan 7:8). I don’t think anyone can deny, whether they oppose him or support him, that Mr. Trump utters proud words and speaks boastfully.  The New York Times (Feb 15, 2026) describes it like this: “President Trump has engaged in a spree of self-aggrandizement unlike any of his predecessors, fostering a mythologized superhuman persona and making himself the inescapable force at home and around the world.”  According to Mr. Trump, the things he builds or accomplishes are the best or biggest or greatest ever.  The attendance at his inauguration was the highest ever.  His economy is the best ever. He often put down former President Biden as the worst president ever, while claiming that he is the best president ever, or at least on par with George Washington. It matters little whether the objective standard measurements used to determine such things contradict his evaluation—it is what he says that matters in his mind and in the eyes of his supporters. Mr. Trump himself justifies his self-promoting manner by saying, “Remember, if you don’t promote yourself, then no one else will!” This is quite opposite to the wisdom of Proverbs, which says: “Let another praise you, and not your own mouth, someone else, and not your own lips” (Prov 27:2). Regarding the blasphemous trait, this is not as prominent yet for President Trump as the boastful trait, but he seems to be testing the waters with blasphemous or border-line blasphemous statements or posts, such as the posts of himself as pope and the Christ-like post which Marjorie Taylor Greene called blasphemous.  Mr. Trump’s profanity laden threat to Iran on April 5th, which he ended sarcastically with “Praise to Allah,” almost certainly seemed blasphemous to Muslims, and resulted in backlash from his own conservative Republican camp as well, most notably form Tucker Carlson, who said, “How dare you?” and “vile on every level.”

                The third reason that Donald Trump could be the Antichrist is that his character is opposite to Christ in almost every conceivable way.  Here I borrow from my earlier post “Trump and Jesus” to compare the character of Christ, which is our standard as Christians, with the character of Donald Trump.  Jesus taught and modeled love.  Mr. Trump speaks and models hate. Jesus brings people of diverse backgrounds together into one body in Christ.  Donald Trump divides the nation into polarized factions. Jesus is the Truth.  Mr. Trump tells so many lies the fact checkers can’t keep up with him. Jesus was a servant leader.  President Trump is a lord-it-over leader. Jesus promoted forgiveness.  Mr. Trump exacts revenge. Jesus valued all races and peoples equally.  Donald Trump values white men over diversity. Jesus was single and celibate.  Mr. Trump is sexually immoral and has been divorced and remarried multiple times. Jesus ministered to the poor and marginalized.  President Trump enriches himself while cutting off aid and benefits to the poor.  Jesus sacrificed for others, giving his own life.  Mr. Trump looks out for his own self-interest. Jesus was confident but humble. Donald Trump is arrogant and proud.  Jesus never sinned.  Mr. Trump claims he never does wrong, but the evidence overwhelmingly proves otherwise. Jesus was concerned about justice.  President Trump constantly obstructs or subverts justice.  In almost every way imaginable, Donald Trump’s character is the opposite of Jesus.

                For these three reasons—he has a Messianic identity and Messianic ambitions, he speaks proud words and blasphemies, and his character is the opposite to that of Christ, I believe we can say that Donald Trump could be the Antichrist. That is not to say that he necessarily is or will be.  For one thing, he is old, so if he is the Antichrist, then things must happen quickly. For another, the political tide may be turning against him.  His popularity level in the US is declining, and he is vastly unpopular in many parts of the world. Republicans are fearing that the mid-term elections could be disastrous. Some see the defeat of Victor Orban in Hungary as a harbinger of things to come for President Trump and his MAGA movement as well. Thus, even though Mr. Trump may have Messianic ambitions, these may not come to fruition.  On the other hand, it would be premature if not foolish to count him out. His political career seemed to be finished after the January 6th riots of 2021. Almost no one was willing to defend him.  But somehow, he managed to sway opinions and rewrite the narrative so that he got himself re-elected as President. So, we must be wary about ever counting him out.  Moreover, he has installed loyalists throughout the courts and military and has systematically dismantled accountability structures within the government.  If he decides on even bolder anti-democratic measures, like cancelling elections and declaring martial law, who is going to stop him?

                In my opinion, based on correlation with the biblical material about the Antichrist, Donald Trump could be the Antichrist. As already stated, this doesn’t mean that he necessarily is, but it does mean that the situation bears close watching.  If he is, there are things that will happen that will continue to strengthen the case.  Next time, in part 2 of this blog, we will look at those.

  • Trump and Jesus

    Because so many Christians, especially evangelicals, have supported Donald Trump, the names of Trump and Jesus have unfortunately come to be linked together.  Pro-Trump rallies have often had signs favorably connecting Donald Trump and Jesus.  Yet, it is hard to think of anyone who is less like Jesus than Mr. Trump.  Many Christians recognize that his character is a problem but voted for him anyway because he opposes the liberal left and supports some key causes that Christians care about. To some degree, that is understandable. But shouldn’t evangelicals, of all people, believe that character matters?  Do we realize what a big shift it represents to say that character in our leaders doesn’t matter?  During the sex scandal of the Clinton years, evangelicals were insistent that character mattered.  Donald Trump is at least as sexually immoral as Bill Clinton ever was, yet now suddenly it doesn’t matter?  With President Trump’s turn towards authoritarianism, consider what it means that a person of his character has almost absolute power.  If we think that doesn’t matter, we will surely come to regret it.

    Let’s compare the character of Christ, which is our standard as Christians, with the character of Donald Trump.  Jesus taught and modeled love.  Mr. Trump speaks and models hate. Jesus brings people of diverse backgrounds together into one body in Christ.  Donald Trump divides the nation into polarized factions. Jesus is the Truth.  Mr. Trump tells so many lies the fact checkers can’t keep up with him. Jesus was a servant leader.  President Trump is a lord-it-over leader. Jesus promoted forgiveness.  Mr. Trump exacts revenge. Jesus valued all races and peoples equally.  Donald Trump values white workers over diversity. Jesus was single and celibate.  Mr. Trump is sexually immoral and has been divorced and remarried multiple times. Jesus ministered to the poor and marginalized.  President Trump enriches himself while cutting off aid or benefits to the poor.  Jesus sacrificed for others, giving his own life.  Mr. Trump looks out for his own self-interest. Jesus was confident but humble. Donald Trump is arrogant and proud.  Jesus never sinned.  Mr. Trump claims he never does wrong, but the evidence overwhelmingly proves otherwise. Jesus was concerned about justice.  President Trump constantly obstructs or subverts justice.  In almost every way imaginable, Donald Trump’s character is the opposite of Jesus. You don’t need to listen to his political opponents to come to these conclusions.  You can just think about his words and actions that you have seen and heard for yourself.  Indeed, many Christians who voted for Mr. Trump know these things to be true.  It is time that we wake up to the seriousness of these character deficiencies before it is too late.

    There is one thing Jesus and Mr. Trump have in common—both demand absolute loyalty.  But when Donald Trump’s character is so diametrically opposed to the character of Jesus, you can not give absolute loyalty to Mr. Trump without compromising your loyalty to Jesus and his teachings. Jesus said, “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other.  You cannot serve God and money” (Matt 6:24).  The same principle applies here—you cannot serve Jesus and Donald Trump.  Mike Pence tried and found out he could not do it.  And neither can we.

  • Their evil deeds have no limit ..

    The last blog began a series based on words from the prophets Isaiah and Jeremiah which are compellingly relevant to our times.  The first text was, “Do not call conspiracy everything they call conspiracy …” (Isa 8:12). We ended with the command not to fear what the conspiracists wants us to fear, in our case, the evils of the liberal left, or conversely, the vengeance of President Trump.  Rather, the one we are to fear and dread is God himself.  Our text today tells us why.

    Jeremiah 5:28-29 says, “[They] have grown fat and sleek. Their evil deeds have no limit; they do not seek justice.” Jeremiah said concerning the Israelite leaders and people of his time: “their evil deeds have no limit.” That is how I feel about our present administration each day when I read the news.  Is there no end to falsehoods, bullying, and disregard for justice and the rule of law?  Each day the transgressions seem to be more blatant and bolder: pardoning criminals right and left, including the former president of Honduras, who was rightly convicted of drug crimes and the Chinese billionaire in the crypto-currency business who is an ally of President Trump; openly pursuing vindication against his political enemies, like James Comey and Leticia James, for charges that respectable prosecutors have deemed inadequate; clearly having something to hide with the Epstein files, first refusing to turn them over only to reverse course and say that he would while still refusing to fully release them; rounding up immigrants without due process and treating them harshly as criminals, the vast majority of whom have no criminal record and many of whom have demonstrated decades worth of value-add in our communities; blatantly enriching himself through business ventures while president without any regard for conflict of interest; attacking boats and killing people as adversaries of war without any clear justification that we are at war (and without any authorization from Congress); kidnapping and charging President Maduro of Venezuela in a way that even many of our allies regard as a violation of international law; making further threats of aggression against Canada, Greenland, and Cuba; and on and on it goes. And on and on it will go. 

    God’s indictment continues in the second half of verse 28: “they do not defend the just cause of the poor.”  President Trump has failed to defend the cause of the poor both internationally, with the cut to foreign aid which will result in the unnecessary deaths of thousands of the poorest and most vulnerable around the world, and domestically, with his “big, beautiful bill” which cuts benefits for the poor while providing tax breaks that provide the greatest benefit to the rich. Since Mr. Trump has been president, his net worth has skyrocketed and Mr. Musk has been offered the first trillion-dollar contract, while millions of lower income people in America and around the world find their condition becoming increasingly dire.

    After pronouncing his indictments in verse 28: “their evil dceds have no limit … they do not defend the just cause of the poor,” God asks two questions, “Should I not punish them for this?” “Should I nor avenge myself on such a nation as this?” (verse 29).  The implied answer is of course he should punish them and avenge himself on such a people as this.  That is why God is the one we should fear and dread.  The warning applies not only to the leader, in our case President Trump, but to the nation, for putting him into power and for defending his evils while opposing those who attempt to hold him accountable.

  • How did we get here?

    How did we get here?

    Note: this was written in March 2025 and so much more has happened since then, but it is still relevant.

    How did we get here, that is, to this point where we have a man like Mr. Trump elected president for the second time, with the support of most evangelicals, despite myriads of incidents and scandals that would have derailed any other candidate?  Four things come to mind, the first is that evangelicals decided on a transactional approach in which character doesn’t matter, if the candidate supports our core causes. But should evangelicals, of all people, be saying that character doesn’t matter?  Do we realize what a big shift this represents?  During the sex scandal of the Clinton years, evangelicals were insistent that character mattered.  Trump is at least as sexually immoral as Clinton ever was, yet now suddenly it doesn’t matter! With Trump’s turn towards authoritarianism, consider what it means that a person of his character has almost absolute power.  That is a very dangerous situation and we deceive ourselves if we think character doesn’t matter.

                The second explanation as to how we got here is that we believed Trump’s lies.  Or, to put it the other way around, Mr. Trump succeeded in deceiving a large portion of the American public into believing his lies.  If we look back, we can observe how he has done this.  I don’t think it is difficult to see what his tactics were (and are). He is so prolific in doing this (unfortunately) that it will take a separate blog article will expose 9 ways in which he succeeds in getting millions of Americans to believe his lies.

    Third, we got here as evangelicals because we failed to think theologically about a host of other issues besides the core issues that drove initial conservative support for Trump.  Those core issues were abortion / right to life, religious liberties, and opposition to the LGBT agenda.  But many other issues are part of the conservative agenda as well, such as opposition to any form of gun control, cutting government social programs that help the poor, taking a hard stance on immigration, and opposing climate change initiatives. And now Trump has added his own priorities, such as cutting off all federal aid that helps the poor worldwide, being anti-diversity of all kinds, being against medical and scientific research, and hiring and firing in the government based on loyalty to him rather than competency. Have we taken the time to reflect theologically on these issues to determine whether the conservative stance, especially Trump’s form of it, is truly a Biblical or Christian stance?  Or have we simply taken it as a package deal and assumed that the conservative stance is the Christian stance?  It is beyond the scope of this essay to evaluate theologically each of these issues, but if we were to do so we might find that many of these are simply American conservative values, not Christian values, and in some cases these political stances go square against Christian teaching.

    Besides all this, perhaps the most significant issue that needs to be thought through theologically is Christian Nationalism, which seeks to politically establish Christianity as the dominant moral and cultural order.  The strategy was well thought out by the crafters of Project 2025, which Trump denied knowing anything about, yet it has provided the blueprint for his barrage of executive orders.  According to CNN’s analysis, 36 of 53 first week executive orders evoked proposals outlined in project 2025’s blueprint for the next Republican president. Is the strategy of Christian Nationalism the strategy that evangelical Christians should be supporting?  Have we thought about this theologically?  It seeks to establish a kind of theocracy like that in the Old Testament, but is there anything in the New Testament that suggests this should be our goal in the present era?  Have we considered the outcomes historically when Christianity has allied itself with political power?  Has not Christianity thrived and been at its purest and best when it was not allied with political power, but was a persecuted minority? What is the eschatology behind Christian Nationalism?  Are we looking for Christ to come and establish a political kingdom of justice and righteousness (the pre-millennial view) or do we think it is our job to usher in a Christian political kingdom (the post-millennial view)?  American evangelicals have been predominately pre-millennial (remember the Left Behind series?) but now are throwing their support behind a Christian Nationalism approach that is essentially post-millennial.  Has anyone noticed that this is happening or asked whether we in fact agree with the theology behind it?  Or have we just been carried along by the conservative political winds, assuming that all this is what God wants?  

    Fourth, we got here by overlooking warning signs along the way. Before the 2016 election, the Access Hollywood tapes came out in which we heard Trump talk boastfully about groping women because someone famous like him can do whatever he wants.  This was disgusting, yet most evangelicals easily gave him a pass after he walked back the comments by saying that was just “locker room talk.”  Is this the kind of locker room talk that you would find acceptable for your son to say, or for you yourself to say as an evangelical Christian, or even for any decent person to say?  No—of course not!  That was an early warning sign, but evangelicals ignored it.  We should have taken warning when Trump went against precedence by refusing to turn over his tax returns when he was running for president in 2016.  This clearly looked like the behavior of someone who had something to hide.  Even when his tax returns were leaked and it was revealed that he, a billionaire, paid only $750 in federal taxes the year he entered the White House, much less than the average American, his supporters were unconcerned.  They easily accepted his explanation that he was just smart in how he did his taxes. But something is wrong when a billionaire is paying far less in taxes than the average American. This was a warning sign, but his supporters ignored it.

    Consider the firing of FBI director James Comey during Trump’s first term.  The FBI was investigating Trump for his attempt to interfere with the election by colluding with Russians.   Trump didn’t like it, so he fired Comey.  Firing the person who is investigating you is not proper protocol for someone who is transparent and above board.  It is what you expect from a president who has something to hide.  That should have been a warning sign.  The Democrats in the House impeached him for it, but Republicans overlooked it. Consider also the former cabinet members, who were appointed by Trump himself, but after working with him for some time and seeing what he was like, now speak harshly against him.  John Kelley was his former chief of staff for two years, and during this last election cycle came out calling Trump a fascist because of his dictatorial tendencies and for saying that he wished his military leaders would show the same deference to him that Hitler’s military showed to him.  Of course, Trump denied it, but John Kelley is known as an honorable military leader.  Is he not a credible source?  Other respected military leaders have also spoken against Trump, such as General McCrystal, retired four-star general who said that he would not be willing to work for Trump because it is important to work for people that he thinks are basically honest. Republicans have traditionally had high regard for the military, so comments like these coming from these men should have been a warning.  Yet evangelical voters ignored it.

    Bill Barr, Trump’s Attorney General in his first term, and Mike Pence, his Vice President, had been loyal to a fault in serving Trump.  Yet Barr knew there was no credible evidence to support Trump’s claim that the election was stolen, and he resigned rather than being forced to promote Trump’s narrative.  Pence refused to abdicate his duty to certify the election because he knew it was his constitutional duty, even though Trump pressured him to do it. As a result, the rioters, with Trump’s approval, shouted “Hang Pence.”  Evangelicals knew Pence to be a fellow evangelical and person of integrity and for Trump to pressure him to violate the constitution was a serious line to cross.  That was a huge warning sign.  Yet Republicans, including evangelicals, still chose Trump over Pence and others as the Republican candidate for 2024. Regarding the January 6th insurrection, we saw the footage for ourselves of what Trump said on the White House lawn and how he incited the rioters to go the capitol.  What he did was so obvious and inexcusable that 10 House Republicans joined the Democrats in impeaching him and 7 Senate Republicans voted to convict him.  In this polarized era, that is almost unheard of.  If there was any doubt as to his culpability, the January 6th hearings led by Liz Cheney, a conservative Republican, and others, provided strong evidence of his guilt.  Yet many Trump supporters wouldn’t watch or even consider the evidence, because Trump convinced them it was a witch hunt.  As Christians, aren’t we supposed to care about truth enough to look at the evidence?  When encouraging people to consider Christ, don’t we tell them to examine the evidence and see for themselves?  Is Trump above Christ that one can give support to him without even considering the evidence?  When Republicans, including most evangelicals, decided to stay with Trump after all this, a line was crossed.  It became clear that Trump had such a hold on them that literally nothing he could do, even as unthinkable as inciting an insurrection before their very eyes, could dissuade them from supporting him.  Consider the parable of the frog in boiling water.  If you put a frog in a pot of boiling water, it will instantly leap out. But if you put it in a pot filled with pleasantly tepid water and gradually heat it, the frog will remain in the water until it boils to death.   Evangelicals who are still “in the pot” with Trump must be more discerning than they have been in the past and have the wherewithal to jump out of the pot before it is too late.